On the same topic, I recently read that there is decreasing foreign demand for treasuries in a piece attached to a recent "Mineset" mailing (Mineset is a letter I receive from known gold expert, Jim Sinclair). In the letter, Sinclair attaches quotes from an article by Michael Mackenzie who points out that "Holdings of U.S. Treasuries by foreign central banks has fallen by a record amount over the past four weeks according to the latest Federal Reserve data." So while there is demand of late, it is no thanks to foreign banks.
Investment demand for US treasuries is complex. We cannot simply say that demand or lack there of is a sign of any grave danger or miraculous rally. It is important to note such allocation of capital however, because it can help us from getting too caught up in common assumptions. What's bullish for stocks may not be bearish for bonds and vice versa. Let's not see the treasuries rally big one day when the stock market is down and profess that it is because investors are "fleeing for safety". I mean who has ever heard reporters toss that baseless term around to simplify a story? Despite a positive US data backdrop and robust looking stock market, treasuries are still the toast of the capital allocation town.
Investment demand for US treasuries is complex. We cannot simply say that demand or lack there of is a sign of any grave danger or miraculous rally. It is important to note such allocation of capital however, because it can help us from getting too caught up in common assumptions. What's bullish for stocks may not be bearish for bonds and vice versa. Let's not see the treasuries rally big one day when the stock market is down and profess that it is because investors are "fleeing for safety". I mean who has ever heard reporters toss that baseless term around to simplify a story? Despite a positive US data backdrop and robust looking stock market, treasuries are still the toast of the capital allocation town.
No comments:
Post a Comment